and the irony of it all...they were attacked by the Sudan 
People's Liberation Army
. Perhaps renaming the PLA to 
China Army is not so crazy after all.
China nationals missing after attack in Sudan
Associated Press – 10 hrs ago
BEIJING (AP) — China's Foreign Ministry says a number of Chinese nationals are missing after militants attacked their company in Sudan's volatile South Kordofan region.
The ministry's statement said the attack occurred Saturday and Sudan launched a search Sunday.
It did not say how many Chinese were missing.
The official Xinhua News Agency said 35 people were at the site when it was attacked and most of them are Chinese.
Xinhua said the Sudan People's Liberation Army attacked a road-building site.
China has close political and economic relations with Sudan, especially in the energy sector.
 One Night In Khartoum 
Khartoum,  North Africa City
One night in Khartoum makes a hard man humble
Not much between despair and ecstasy
One night in Khartoum and the tough guys tumble
Can't be too careful with your company
I can feel the devil walking next to me 
PLAAF in Khartoum during the Libya evacuation, must be nice to have local support.
Notice the Chinese style roof in the adjacent apartment buildings.  
On a more serious note, latest write up from Gabe Collins and Andrew S. Erickson
Implications of China’s Military Evacuation of Citizens from Libya
Publication: China Brief Volume: 11 Issue: 4
March 10, 2011 07:01 PM Age: 35 min
Category: China Brief, Home Page, Military/Security, Africa, China and the Asia-Pacific
By: Gabe Collins , Andrew S. Erickson
http://www.jamestown.org/programs/chinabrief/single/?tx_ttnews[tt_news]=37633&tx_ttnews[backPid]=25&cHash=c1302a9ecaddfc23450fb6ec13a98136
The People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) made history with the news on  February 25 that the frigate Xuzhou, one of the navy’s most modern  warships, had been dispatched to waters near Libya to support and  protect the evacuation of Chinese citizens. The Libya operation is the  Chinese military’s first operational deployment to Africa and the  Mediterranean, as well as its largest noncombatant evacuation operation  (NEO) to date, with virtually all 35,000 PRC citizens in the country  evacuated as of March 3. The bulk of Chinese nationals in Libya were  evacuated by sea on chartered merchant vessels (primarily from  Benghazi), in addition to chartered aircraft (primarily from Tripoli),  military aircraft (Sabha to Khartoum, Sudan), and overland (buses to  Tunisia and Egypt). A significant number of individuals are still  traveling back to China via international transit hubs, but none are  vulnerable to the growing violence in Libya. The deployment of Xuzhou  sets a major precedent because it marked the first time China has sent  military assets to a distant part of the world to protect its citizens  there. This is an historical first for China, and represents Beijing’s  growing capability to conduct long-range operations that it was both  incapable of doing, and unwilling to do, only a decade ago.
Coordinated Multiservice Operations
The NEO operation involved an intricate level of interagency  coordination, with the Ministries of Commerce, Foreign Affairs, and  Public Security working closely with the Civil Aviation Administration  of China and consular officials. In addition, Chinese companies  operating in Libya, including the China National Petroleum Corporation  (CNPC) and China Rail Construction and shippers like COSCO who helped  evacuate Chinese citizens from Libya, coordinated closely with the  government agencies listed above (Xinhua News Agency, February 24).
Major General Ji Mingkui of the PLA’s National Defense University (NDU)  supported the idea that improved coordination and communication within  and beyond the services has bolstered China’s ability to perform  non-traditional security missions, noting that “in previous evacuation  missions, the PLA Navy would not have performed well because tasking  areas suffered from siloing” (Sina.com, February 26).
China’s intensive Libya rescue mission also marks the first use of  long-range military transport aircraft to rescue Chinese citizens from a  foreign conflict zone. On February 28, four IL-76 transport aircraft  were dispatched to Libya via Khartoum with Central Military Commission  (CMC) approval. As of the evening of March 2, the IL-76s had moved 1,700  Chinese from Libya to Khartoum, Sudan.
During the Libya operation, the four PLAAF IL-76s used Khartoum as a  stopover on both the inbound and outbound legs of the trip (Xinhua News  Agency, March 4). Khartoum’s use as a waypoint reflects Sudan’s  strategic importance to China. Indeed, as Chinese economic and human  presence in Africa continues to rise, the fact that military aircraft  were allowed to land and refuel there also suggest that the Sudanese  government may be comfortable with the idea of fitting into a Chinese  “places, not bases” strategy whereby the PRC ensures that it has access  to various airfields to support future evacuation operations and other  missions in Africa. Furthermore, China Communications Construction  Company’s recent announcement that it has entered into a $1.2 billion  contract to build a new airport in Khartoum capable of handling aircraft  as large as the Airbus A380 will offer incentives and ensure that local  infrastructure is up to the task (BBC, February 15).
External Strategic Implications
The deployments send a clear diplomatic message: Beijing is unwilling to  tolerate Chinese citizens being harmed by large-scale political  violence overseas. They also signal that as the Chinese military becomes  more proficient in long-range operations, it will increasingly be able  to scale-up deployments if necessary.
China’s strong participation in UN peacekeeping operations in Africa and  other areas has created a core group of personnel with operational  experience in key parts of the world. China had nearly 1,900 troops  detailed to UN peacekeeping missions as of January 31, 2011 [1].  Transport logistics and the political will to send forces overseas have  been missing links to date with respect to creating a large  expeditionary capability within the PLA, and the Libya deployments mark a  first step to addressing both issues. Also, like the ongoing Gulf of  Aden counter-piracy task forces, this offers PLAN forces a valuable  training opportunity, so that they will be even more experienced and  capable in the future.
The Libya mission builds on the PLAN’s Gulf of Aden deployments, and  showcases potential military missions “beyond Taiwan” in which the PLA  can become involved. China’s decision and ability to send a modern  warship and long-range military transport aircraft to a violence-wracked  country halfway across the globe will have strategic repercussions that  will reverberate for some time, particularly in East and Southeast  Asia, the Indian Ocean region, and Africa.
On the other hand, Xuzhou’s mission may actually incentivize Chinese  cooperation against non-traditional security threats because, along with  the Gulf of Aden counter-piracy mission, it is a concrete demonstration  of capabilities that will likely make it harder for China to free ride  during future crises that require multilateral responses. Prominent  Chinese strategists are supporting a move away from China’s traditional  mantra of non-interference in other countries’ internal politics. For  example, Zhao Kejin of Tsinghua University argues that China can no  longer afford to “use a mechanical interpretation of the  non-interference policy” and needs to adopt a more flexible way of  thinking that takes each situation and its characteristics into account  (Global Times, February 24).
Domestic Strategic Implications
The successful—and unprecedented—PLAN and PLAAF participation in the  Libya NEO operation has significant ramifications for defense  procurement and security policy discussions within China. These include  accelerated procurement of certain key naval assets such as carriers,  the wisdom of forward-deployed forces, how to manage the growing Chinese  expatriate presence in Africa and other volatile regions where security  problems are almost certain to arise, and how to handle popular  nationalist pressures for intervening when Chinese citizens abroad are  threatened.
Successfully protecting Chinese merchant ships from pirates and  evacuating Chinese citizens from violent areas are great cards for PLA  senior naval officers and civilian supporters of a strong navy to play  during internal procurement debates. Having the PLAN consistently answer  the call when China’s overseas comrades and commercial interests need  protection clearly explains the force’s value and will smooth the way  for advocates of the carrier program, as well as those who seek a more  robust long-range naval capability in general.
By highlighting the diplomatic value of a powerful and clearly visible  surface ship, the Xuzhou mission may also spark important debates  between proponents of the surface warfare and submarine communities  within the PLA and civilian leadership. The surface warfare faction can  argue that it is the most useful in handling the increasingly frequent  non-traditional security missions involving Chinese interests and that  naval spending should therefore favor carriers and other visible  platforms. In a recent analysis of the Libya evacuation, Global Times  reflected pro-surface ship sentiments, stating “China must speed up  building its ocean cruising fleet, including aircraft carriers. An ocean  cruising navy will enhance China’s ability to execute its global  strategy not only as a deterrence against military provocations, but  also as overall protection for China’s national interests” (Global  Times, February 28). The military will have the funds to further develop  expeditionary capabilities, as China plans to increase military  spending by 12.7 percent in 2011, to $91.5 billion [2].
Chinese policymakers will also likely place more consideration on  maintaining a sustained naval presence in the Indian Ocean region than  they did prior to the Libya crisis. The main reason Xuzhou was a useful  asset in the Libya contingency was because it was already forward  deployed as part of China’s anti-piracy mission in the Gulf of Aden.  Senior PLAN and civilian leaders are receiving a firsthand lesson in how  useful forward deployed military assets are for a country like China  that has increasingly global interests. The anti-piracy missions cracked  open the door, but we believe that from this point forward, there is a  strong likelihood that the PLAN will seek to assume a more sustained  presence in the Indian Ocean region, perhaps extending toward the  Persian Gulf as well.
Conclusion
China’s Foreign, Defense, and Commerce Ministries will increasingly have  to grapple with a Chinese expatriate presence in volatile areas that is  both growing and becoming more diffuse. The basic economics of working  overseas are very appealing to many Chinese workers due to the higher  pay they receive. In turn, as the number of PRC expatriates working for  larger companies like CNPC or China Rail Construction in places like  Libya, Angola, Congo, or Sudan increases, business opportunities arise  for independent entrepreneurs who follow and establish Chinese  restaurants and other amenities for the large company workers. As small  merchants, traders, and others join, the large company investments  become an anchor for a larger and more diffuse Chinese community in that  country.
Beijing will likely struggle to balance the national pride many Chinese  feel about the rescue operation with the fact that the precedent set  will substantially increase popular pressure for intervention in future  crises. The issue is an emotional one for those involved in the rescue  and likely their families as well. An article describing the March 1  rendezvous between Venizelos, a cruise ship carrying more than 2,000  Chinese evacuees, and Xuzhou says many on deck burst into tears of joy  when they sighted the warship (International Online, March 4). Two bits  of anecdotal evidence support the assertion that the government is  assiduously managing reporting of the military aspects of the mission.  Contacts in China tell us television coverage of the military’s  participation in the Libya evacuation mission by Mainland stations has  been more subdued than they would have expected. On the Internet,  entering the Chinese-character search terms for “Libya Xuzhou Navy” into  Google, which does not submit to PRC government censorship, yields  roughly 1.2 million search results. Plugging the same terms into Baidu,  which complies, yields only 98,800 results, as of March 4.
This dynamic has real strategic implications for two major reasons.  First, in the event of major political violence, natural disasters, or  other dangerous situations, workers who live in the compounds of major  Chinese companies can be located relatively easily and their evacuation  arranged accordingly. The predominance of large firm workers and their  concentrated locations in Libya facilitated the evacuation process.  Independent businessmen and traders, on the other hand, will likely be  much harder for the PRC Embassy to locate and communicate with in a time  of turmoil. Second, independent entrepreneurs who may have much of  their wealth tied up in a shop or place of business are more likely to  use violence to defend their assets against looters or marauders. Use of  force to defend property, while entirely understandable, would  exacerbate street violence and raises the risk that unrest combined with  latent anti-Chinese sentiments among the working population in some  countries could catalyze more explicitly anti-Chinese violence and put  additional pressure on Beijing to intervene.
Notes:
1. “Contributors to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations,” United  Nations, 31 January 2011,  www.un.org/en/peacekeeping/contributors/2011/jan11_1.pdf.
2. “Report on the Implementation of the Central and Local Budgets in  2010 and the Draft Estimates of the 2011 Central and Local Budgets,”  Ministry of Finance, March 5, 2011,  online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/2011NPCBudgetReportZhFull.pdf.