Wednesday, September 16, 2026

The Other Beneficiary of China's Anti-Piracy Mission, The PLAN Marine Considerations

 

The PLA Navy's 49th Escort Task Force recently conducted counterterrorism and anti-piracy drills, receiving the usual round of media coverage.

The PLAN's anti-piracy mission began in 2008 amid considerable fanfare and has since attracted extensive attention from civilian observers, military analysts, and think tanks. Andrew Erickson of the U.S. Naval War College's China Maritime Studies Institute (CMSI) is one of the leading scholars on the subject, as are many of his colleagues at CMSI.

What receives far less attention is how the PLA Marine Corps, particularly its special operations unit, the "Jiaolong" Brigade, has benefited from these sustained overseas deployments. Not all of their experience has come from scripted training events. Some of it has been gained through real-world operational deployments, making this an area that deserves further study.

Looking back through photos of the Jiaolong Brigade over the years, there appears to have been a noticeable evolution in both equipment and operational practices. Some of these changes likely reflect lessons learned from deployments to the Gulf of Aden, while others may have come from working alongside or observing foreign navies conducting similar missions.

From a small-unit perspective, one of the more interesting questions is how the PLA Marines have translated their Gulf of Aden experience into broader tactical and organizational improvements. Have boarding procedures changed? Has equipment selection evolved? Have they adopted different approaches to training, communications, or force protection based on operational lessons learned?

There may already be a study on this topic, but if so, it has largely escaped my attention. It would certainly be an interesting read.

 










Looking back at 2020 

 https://china-defense.blogspot.com/2020/08/photos-of-day-china-mairne-spops-in.html

Special operations soldiers assigned to a reconnaissance battalion with the Marine Corps under the PLA Navy conduct diving operations underwater with rifles during a recent special operations training exercise. (eng.chinamil.com.cn/Photo by Yan Jialuo, Pu Yuxiang and Xia Lei)




Tuesday, July 05, 2011


VBSS body armor adopted.

Judging by the photos of PLAN's 9th Task Force to the Gulf and Aden, it seems the PLAN SpOps team has adopted Clear Duty's VBSS body armor.    Also noted from the photo of a fore-gripped Type95, the PLAN is allowing its elites a greater leverage in customizing their gear.

All those adjustments show that the decision to participate in the anti-piracy duties is paying dividends in unexpected ways for the PLAN.






Friday, June 10, 2011


PLAMC testing new VBSS body armor vest for boarding team 


Clear Duty VBSS body armor vest is being tested by the PLAMC for boarding party. It's made by a local Chinese private company. VBSS stands for Visit, Board, Search, and Seizure operation.

The CD VBSS is more comfortable and offers quick-release that the standard issued Type 06 body armor lacks. The quick-release is a life saver if a boarding team member fall into the water. All he needed it is just pull the quick-release to remove the vest (which will be loaded down with hard plates, ammo, pistol, comm & other gears) and swim to the surface.

The vest uses Kevlar material and has large SAPI size hard plate pocket in the front and back. --
- Timothy Yan




 

Thursday, January 28, 2010

China to lead SHADE's anti-piracy patrols off Somalia

In November 2009, China expressed interest in playing a “lead role” in the fight against Somali pirates. (here) They requested to co-chair SHADE (Shared Awareness and Deconfliction) jointly with the EU and US-led Combined Maritime Force, headquartered in Bahrain.

After receiving support from the EU delegation, China is now approved to lead SHADE's anti-piracy patrols off Somalia. This effort will also require Chinese warships to patrol a sector of the special transit corridor through the most dangerous part of the Gulf of Aden and it also means China will need to send more than the three ships currently deployed off the Horn of Africa. Naturally, there are political complications for such a development and they can be summarized as follows.

First, there are those who view any Chinese military development, especially in the Indian Ocean, with suspicion. By operating under an international framework China’s effort can be seen as a positive step in alleviating suspicion.

Second, others see China’s military growth as “natural.” Writing in the current edition of the Atlantic monthly, Robert Kaplan argues that “as a great continental nation’s economy grows, it begins to trade more with the outside world and develops interests it did not have previously” (here) and that the Chinese build up mirrors what the United States once did. In that light, China is following a natural growth path. This group is less concerned about a PLAN “misadventure” in the region as long as its posture is not overly aggressive.

Lastly, there is also a group of critics who charge that China has enjoyed a free-ride provided by the United States Navy in protecting international waters (here). With 2.4 Trillion dollars in the Bank, China should constitute a greater share of the MOOTW burden. Unlike the previous two groups, this group would welcome greater Chinese participation in protecting the "liberal trade" system that the world enjoys.

Political considerations aside, in order for the PLAN to support an expanded naval deployment, it would require a greater fleet reserve at home. As a general rule, to maintain a task force of three ships on-station, the PLAN would need to keep a total of 9 ships on reserve: three on training, three on crew rotation and maintenance, and three on-station. That requirement could provide the justification the PLAN seeks for naval build up at home and abroad (expect to see more Type 054A frigates on order). Second, the PLAN would need to increase their C2 assets in order to communicate with other members of SHADE. The current fleet PLAN is not equipped with the extensive communication gear that can deal with a 40-nation strong Maritime Force. A PLAN overseas naval base in Djibouti seems to be an ideal location to host such a C2 asset. (here)

All in all, China’s mission to fight pirates is becoming "historical" indeed.


China to lead anti-piracy patrols
PLA Navy officials agree to expanded role co-ordinating international efforts off Somalia
Greg Torode Chief Asia correspondent in Singapore
Jan 28, 2010
http://www.scmp.com/portal/site/SCMP/menuitem.2c913216495213d5df646910cba0a0a0/?vgnextoid=12aa9d9df9076210VgnVCM100000360a0a0aRCRD&vgnextfmt=teaser&ss=China&s=News
China has won approval to lead the co-ordination of international anti-piracy patrols off Somalia - an unprecedented expansion of its historic deployment of warships to the Indian Ocean.
The effort will also see China send its warships to permanently patrol a sector of the special transit corridor through the most dangerous part of the Gulf of Aden. The pledge means that China needs to send more than the three ships it keeps deployed off the Horn of Africa to protect vital trade routes linking Asia to Europe.

PLA Navy officials reached agreement last week over its expanded role with major international navies at a meeting of the so-called Shade grouping in Bahrain, officials at the meeting said.

Shade, or Shared Awareness and Deconfliction, has been jointly headed by European Union forces and the US-led Combined Maritime Forces.

More than two years old, Shade meets monthly to maximise co-ordination and communication among the 40-odd navies now protecting shipping off the Horn of Africa.

While some nations operate as part of international flotillas under the banner of Nato, the EU or the CMF, some operate independently, including China, India, Russia, Malaysia and Iran.

Currently only Nato, EU and CMF ships patrol inside the corridor.

By committing to provide an "enduring" presence in the corridor, China will be eligible to lead as part of a new rotating chairmanship, which will switch every three to four months. It is expected to take charge by the middle of the year.

The move is expected to force India and Russia to seek a greater role, as they try to match a growing Chinese presence in the Indian Ocean.

Captain Chris Chambers, director of operations for the CMF, confirmed China's new role yesterday at a shipping conference in Singapore.

"There has been major progress in communication and co-operation with navies that once didn't really speak to each other," Chambers, a US naval officer, said. "China will get a chance to chair the Shade ... it is a very positive development.

"It will open the door for other independent nations to come in."

Other officials at last week's Bahrain meeting said the PLA was reporting back to Beijing for political approval before a formal announcement could be made.

Both Western and Asian naval officials are backing the move, knowing they are struggling to deal with a worsening piracy situation off Somalia, a failed state where pirates operate with no fear of law enforcement or other government intervention.

While the Gulf of Aden situation has eased under naval pressure, pirates are now attacking ships off Somalia's east coast, travelling more than 1,000 nautical miles into the Indian Ocean to seize ships, putting a wider range of shipping at risk. "It is getting desperate and there is no solution in sight," one foreign naval official said. "Anything China can do to offer more practical help will be taken up at this point. This deal is a straight win-win."

While helping to tackle a worsening international crisis, fighting piracy allows China to quietly develop an Indian Ocean presence - something military analysts believe could be highly strategic to its ambitions to create a navy with wide global reach.

Typically, hijacked ships are taken to pirate lairs on Somalia's east coast. The ship and crew are kept under armed guard but are generally unharmed until the owners can arrange a ransom, which now range between US$2 million and US$7 million.

China began pushing for a broader role after the hijacking in October of mainland bulk carrier the De Xin Hai. The ship, steaming to India with a load of South African coal when it was captured northeast of the Seychelles islands, was released late last month after the payment of US$3.5 million in cash.

The De Xin Hai was the first mainland ship to be captured since Beijing's historic deployment of warships to the area in December 2008.

That deployment marked the first time the Chinese navy had ventured into potential conflict beyond its home waters in centuries.

The PLA warships never attempted to attack or intercept the pirates, with PLA officials later insisting they were too far away at the time.

The warships - two destroyers and an armed supply ship - run regular escorts from convoys of ships registered in Hong Kong, Taiwan and on the mainland. Ships of other nations can join the Chinese convoys.

When not involved with convoys, the Chinese vessels have also assisted other international efforts. China's convoys sail near the transit corridor, keep in contact with it but have not been part of it. Now it has agreed to keep a single ship in the corridor for a month at a time, China will be assigned a 60 nautical mile stretch of ocean to permanently patrol.

Chinese officials have repeatedly suggested that individual countries should be given set areas of ocean to take responsibility for - a concept already in operation inside the corridor.





Commander of Chinese naval escort taskforce visits No. 465 EU naval escort fleet

(Source: MOD) 2009-11-24

Wang Zhiguo (L), commander of the Chinese naval 3rd escort fleet, talks with officials of the European Union (EU) navy 465 formation during his visit to the Dutch frigate "Eversten" at the invitation of the European Union (EU) navy 465 formation in the Gulf of Aden, Nov. 22, 2009. (Xinhua/Guo Gang)

Wang Zhiguo (L), commander of the Chinese naval 3rd escort fleet, talks with officials of the European Union (EU) navy 465 formation during his visit to the Dutch frigate "Eversten" at the invitation of the European Union (EU) navy 465 formation in the Gulf of Aden, Nov. 22, 2009. (Xinhua/Guo Gang)

  On the morning of November 22, local time, Rear Admiral Wang Zhiguo, commanding officer of the Chinese naval escort taskforce and deputy commander of the East China Sea Fleet of the Navy of the Chinese PLA and his 6-member party were invited to visit the "Eversten” guided missile frigate of the Dutch Navy and flagship of the No. 465 European Union (EU) naval escort fleet. Commodore Pieter Bindt, commanding officer of the No. 465 EU naval escort fleet, warmly received the Chinese guests.

   During the talks, Commodore Bindt mainly introduced the escort organization mode and coordination mechanism of the EU naval escort fleet.

  Commodore Bindt noted that the International Cooperation and Coordination Conference for the Escort in the Gulf of Aden held in Beijing on November 6-7 was a testimony of the Chinese side’s stand of actively participating in regional escort and deepening international cooperation and the EU maritime troops appreciated the active attitude adopted by the Chinese side.

  Wang Zhiguo said in the talks that in the face of the current tough situation in the Gulf of Aden and the waters off the Somali coast, the common efforts of the multi-national escort navies were required to ensure the security of the merchant ships.

  Wang also said that the Chinese naval escort taskforce will continue to maintain and strengthen the exchanges and cooperation with the naval escort forces of relevant countries and international organizations and do a good job in escort.

  After the talks, accompanied by Commodore Bindt, Wang Zhiguo and his party visited the "Eversten” frigate and watched the anti-pirate drill of the light and heavy weapon shooting staged by the officers and men of the No. 465 fleet.

  According to the agreement reached by the Chinese and Dutch navies, China and Holland dispatched two young officers respectively to the warship of the other side to conduct a two-day-long on-board study and exchange.

  By Zhu Da, Xu Yeqing
http://eng.chinamil.com.cn/news-channels/china-military-news/2009-11/24/content_4084696.htm






Commander of Chinese naval escort taskforce visits U.S. guided-missile cruiser “Chosin”
(Source: China Military Online) 2009-11-23

Rear Admiral Scott Sanders, commander of the No.151 taskforce of the U.S. Navy, is presenting the emblem of the guided-missile cruiser “Chosin” to Rear Admiral Wang Zhiguo, commander of the Chinese naval escort taskforce.

  On the morning of November 19, at the invitation of Rear Admiral Scott Sanders, commander of the No. 151 taskforce of the U.S. Navy, which was performing escort task in the waters of the Gulf of Aden, Rear Admiral Wang Zhiguo, commander of the third Chinese naval escort taskforce and deputy commander of the East China Sea Fleet of the Navy of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, flied to the guided-missile cruiser “Chosin” of the U.S. Navy for a visit together with his 5-member party and conducted exchanges. This was a return visit to Rear Admiral Sanders and his party’s visit paid to the “Zhoushan” warship of the Chinese naval escort taskforce on November 11.

Editor:Yang Ru

 

Sunday, December 27, 2009

Update on the cargo ship De Xin Hai hijacked by the Somali pirates

I posted the following back in Oct 10, 2009 (here) and looks like they have agreed to the four million USD ransom demand. The crew will be home by Chinese New Year and that is worth celebrating.

Millions of Chinese are now glued to their flat panels wondering how the high seas drama is going to play out. How will China apply its military might in a MOOTW (Military Operation Other Than War)? Will they resort to diplomacy, water cannons, or C803’s? Inquiring minds want to know!

China says ship crew rescued from Somali pirates
BEIJING
Sun Dec 27, 2009 10:15pm EST
http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BR0BO20091228


BEIJING (Reuters) - The crew of a Chinese ship hijacked by Somali pirates in mid-October was safely rescued, the Chinese foreign ministry said on Monday, making no mention of a reported ransom payment.

The De Xin Hai, owned by a unit of China Ocean Shipping or COSCO, was carrying coal and 25 Chinese crew from South Africa to India when seized by pirates east of the Horn of Africa, some 700 nautical miles east of Somalia, on October 19.

Jiang Yu, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, said the crew was rescued early on Monday morning Beijing time, the official Xinhua news agency said.

"The ship has been under the protection of Chinese warships. We will carry out medical checks for the crew, send them to safe waters and bring them back to China as quickly as possible," Jiang said.

The announcement brought to a subdued end a hijacking that had highlighted China's growing presence on global shipping lanes, and brought warnings that Beijing could use military force against the pirates based in Somalia.

The foreign ministry statement gave no details of how the crew was recovered. One of the pirates told Reuters on Sunday a helicopter had dropped a $4 million ransom payment onto the deck of the ship, opening the way to their release.

China sent three warships to Somali waters late last year with great fanfare after a ship carrying oil to China was attacked by pirates. But Chinese warships, like those from other countries, provide protection mainly in the narrow and dangerous Gulf of Aden, not the much larger Indian Ocean.

(Reporting by Huang Yan; Editing by Chris Buckley and Ron Popeski)

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

China vows to save crew held by Somali pirates

Millions of Chinese are now glued to their flat panels wondering how the high seas drama is going to play out. How will China apply its military might in a MOOTW (Military Operation Other Than War)? Will they resort to diplomacy, water cannons, or C803’s? Inquiring minds want to know!

.......Maybe China needs to be nice and negotiate, others counter that force is the only deterrence against those pirates, At any rate, how do you say "Collateral Damage" in Chinese?

As a side note, PLAN's special operation unit in the Gulf of Aden conducted a shooting practice only four days ago.


China vows to save crew held by Somali pirates. But how?
Chinese officials hint that violent action may be taken to rescue the 25 Chinese crew members aboard a cargo ship seized by Somali pirates on Monday.
By Peter Ford | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

from the October 20, 2009 edition
http://www.csmonitor.com/2009/1020/p06s07-wosc.html

Beijing - Chinese officials are being tight-lipped when it comes to explaining what exactly they mean when they say Beijing will make an "all out effort" to rescue a Chinese cargo ship seized by Somali pirates on Monday.

But if it means they will take military action to rescue the crew, it would be the furthest projection of force from China for its navy in modern history.

Three Chinese military vessels are part of the international anti-piracy taskforce, but they are currently patrolling the Gulf of Aden, almost 1,000 miles from the spot where pirates seized the coal-carrying De Xin Hai and her 25 Chinese crew members.

If Beijing decides on a military rescue operation, "The Chinese could go in hard" says David Johnson, manager of Eos, a private British company specializing in maritime security. "They are renowned for aggressive tactics when they come across pirates. They open up on pirate vessels."

He theorized that the Chinese ships in the Gulf of Aden will try to intercept the hijacked cargo ship before it reaches the Somali coast and the pirate enclave around the town of Eyl.

Pirates threaten to execute Chinese crew

The pirates warned Beijing Tuesday not to try a rescue. "We tell China not to endanger the lives of their people with any rescue operation," an associate of the hostage takers who called himself Hassan told Reuters news agency by phone Tuesday. "If they try that we will execute the whole crew," he added.

The Chinese have a squad of marine special forces soldiers on maritime patrol in the Indian Ocean and they have gone through simulated hostage rescue drills. Shortly before the Chinese ships joined the anti-piracy task force last December, Chinese TV aired footage of the drills.

Chinese commandos in training video

In the video, after a failed attempt at negotiating with the "pirates," balaclava clad helicopter and small boat-borne troops storm a vessel and subdue its captors.

Should such tactics be used, the Chinese may seek to take a page out of the American Navy's book. Earlier this year sharpshooters from the US Navy SEALS killed three pirates and rescued the hostage captain of the Alabama, an oil tanker.

The De Xin Hai is the first Chinese-flagged vessel to have been captured by pirates since Beijing's ships joined the piracy patrols. The Chinese crew of another ship successfully fought off pirates with home made Molotov cocktails.

Pirate skiffs have to carry a lot of fuel to give them sufficient range for their operations, Mr. Johnson points out, which makes them vulnerable to fire-bombing.

"Paint thinner in light-bulbs with a cloth stuck in the neck is the preferred weapon, apparently," says Johnson, whose company trains crews and former servicemen how to resist pirate attacks. "It's all pretty crude."






Naval special operation unit conducts live-shell shooting practice

(Source: Xinhua) 2009-10-16


A member of the SOU of the PLA Navy is in live-shell shooting practice on the “Zhoushan” warship on October 14. The members of the SOU on “Zhoushan” warship conducted live-shell shooting practice with such light weapons as automatic rifle, pistol and snipe rifle on the same day. (Photo by Guo Gang)

  On the afternoon of October 14, 2009, 20 members of the special operation unit (SOU) of the Navy of the Chinese PLA conducted light weapon live-shell shooting practice on the “Zhoushan” warship, which is implementing escort mission in the Gulf of Aden and the waters off Somali coast.

  According to Ma Yuqing, the on-spot commander and leader of the SOU, the aim for conducting live-shell shooting practice is to examine the training level of the SOU members, improve their shooting skill under maritime condition and maintain good battle readiness state, so as to better accomplish the escort mission.

  By Guo Gang

Editor:Fan Aifeng

Do you feel lucky?

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, September 15, 2026

PLA 69th Heavy Combined Arms Brigade TOE Update

 The Type 99B MBT finally made its official public debut during the September 2025 Victory Day parade. While observers have been tracking the tank's presence for years, the parade also provided the clearest public acknowledgment yet that the PLA's 69th Heavy Combined Arms Brigade, subordinate to the 80th Group Army of the Northern Theater Command, is operating the type.

The brigade traces its lineage back to February 1947, when it was formed as the 69th Division of the East China Field Army during the PLA's transition from a revolutionary force into a more conventional military. Over the following decades, it evolved alongside changing doctrine and force structure. The unit became the 69th Infantry Division in 1985, was reorganized as the 69th Mechanized Infantry Brigade in 2013, and ultimately emerged as today's 69th Heavy Combined Arms Brigade.

As with many long-serving PLA maneuver formations, its history has largely been one of gradually becoming heavier and more capable. Each major reorganization brought more mechanization, more firepower, and more sophisticated equipment. The arrival of the Type 99B is simply the latest step in that evolution, but it is a noteworthy one nonetheless. The brigade is now the first publicly acknowledged frontline PLA formation equipped with the Type 99B.

Prior to the current upgrade, the brigade's three combined-arms battalions fielded a fairly typical heavy brigade mix of Type 96 main battle tanks and Type 86A/ZBD-86A infantry fighting vehicles, the latter being China's extensively modernized descendant of the BMP-1.

The artillery battalion is likewise a reflection of the brigade's Cold War legacy. It reportedly operates three batteries of PLZ-89 122mm self-propelled howitzers, a battery of PHZ-89 122mm multiple rocket launchers, and two companies equipped with ZSL-02B heavy anti-tank guided missile carriers.

As a heavy brigade, most of the major combat systems are naturally tracked. This remains one of the more old-school armored formations in the PLA inventory, which makes it a fitting home for the Type 99B. Watching one of the PLA's historic "Tiger" units become the first publicly identified Type 99B operator feels less like a surprise and more like the next chapter in a long-running modernization story.







 

Monday, September 14, 2026

Video of the Day: J-15T Spotted Carrying YJ-15 Supersonic Anti-Ship Missiles

In a video reportedly captured near Shenyang Aircraft Corporation (see below), a J-35 can be seen flying alongside a J-15T armed with what appears to be YJ-15 supersonic anti-ship missiles.

Now, before anyone gets too excited, both aircraft are built in Shenyang, so their appearance together could simply be a coincidence. That said, it's hard not to look at the pairing and imagine the kind of maritime strike package the PLAN might have in mind.

We've already seen plenty of photos of PLAN Air Force and naval aviation assets, and there are several posts on this blog covering both aircraft individually. What's interesting here is the possibility of how they might work together. The stealthy J-35 could act as the forward sensor and penetration platform, while the J-15T plays the role of missile truck, hauling a sizable anti-ship loadout. It's a familiar concept that many air forces are pursuing: stealth aircraft find and track targets, while larger aircraft carry the Big Missile

In the context of anti-access/area denial (A2/AD), that's a particularly interesting combination. If reports regarding the YJ-15's range are even close to accurate, the missile would allow PLAN aviation to reach well beyond China's coastline and deep into the First Island Chain. As the old saying goes, it gives them the ability to "reach out and touch someone."

This post is less about hardware specifications and more about what the imagery suggests operationally. Still, the South China Morning Post summarized the reported characteristics of the YJ-15 as follows:

Reported Specifications (link)

  • Speed: Mach 3 to Mach 5+
  • Range: Estimated between 500 km and 1,000+ km, depending on flight profile and source
  • Propulsion: Air-breathing ramjet with a distinctive four-inlet configuration
  • Dimensions: Approximately 6.5 meters long and 0.5 meters in diameter
  • Weight: Around 1,500 kg
  • Warhead: Approximately 200 kg


Whether this particular flight was a planned demonstration or simply a convenient photo opportunity, again, it offers another glimpse of what a future carrier-based maritime strike package could look like: a stealthy J-35 scouting ahead while a missile-laden J-15T brings the punch.  It should not be too much of a surprise by those who are following the PLAN

For naval planners on the other side of the First Island Chain, that's probably the more interesting takeaway.

 



 




 

Sunday, August 23, 2026

Is That a PL‑17 on a J‑16? Yes — and the Real Story Isn’t the Missile.

Much has been written,  or, more accurately, speculated  about the PLAAF’s PL‑17 extreme‑long‑range air‑to‑air missile. People argue about its range, its speed, its seeker, its datalink, its guidance logic, its cosmic aura, whatever. One thing we can actually confirm is simple: it’s huge. The missile is roughly six meters long, and every photo we’ve seen makes it look like someone zip‑tied a telephone pole under a J‑16.

But the interesting part of these zoomed‑in photos isn’t “wow, the PL‑17 mounts on a J‑16.” It’s the strike package around it. Modern air combat isn’t a single fighter launching a single missile in a single heroic duel. It’s an entire kill chain:   fighters, bombers, EW platforms, AEW&C, tankers, escorts, and standoff shooters all operating as one.  That’s how a South Asia air force shut down an entire air‑based “anti‑terror” operation. One can easily find a recent example is floating around online. No need to repeat it here.

This is the same pattern we saw in the PLAAF’s deployment to Egypt for Eagles of Civilization 2026, see blog post belwo: a full‑spectrum package of heavy fighters, tankers, AEW&C, EW aircraft, transports, and helicopters. Not a single aircraft type, not a single mission profile. In another word, a complete ecosystem.
So when there's a PL‑17 hanging under a J‑16, there's a bigger story at play here.

Look at the formation around it: heavy bombers, lightweight escorts, EW support, airborne early warning, tankers, and long‑range shooters all stitched together.

Meanwhile, there are still people out there obsessing over one fighter’s engine production rate or bragging about importing a warbird  from a wine‑producing country. The PLAAF is not one of them. Their focus is the system, not the celebrity aircraft. And the PL‑17 on a J‑16 is just one tile in that mosaic.

Again, thats just me.

 



 

Sunday, August 09, 2026

Official acknowledgment of the day: JL-1 ALBM on the H-6N

 So, we finally have it: official acknowledgment that the JL-1 air-launched ballistic missile is operational enough to be shown mounted on an H-6N. This is the first time Beijing has essentially confirmed — yes, it flies on the bomber built for it.

Cast your mind back to the September parade marking the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in WWII. A whole buffet of new weapons rolled past the cameras, each prompting the usual internet debates. Everyone's entitled to an opinion, that's what the internet is for. I, for one, also have an opinion. Shocked, right?

But this one is huge different, and I'm not talking about the size of the missile.



The JL-1 is a nuclear-capable air-launched ballistic missile, and its appearance on the H-6N is the clearest signal yet that the PLA has closed the last gap in its nuclear triad. Land, sea, air — all three legs now have a credible standoff option.

CCTV is now reporting the JL-1 mounted on a H-6N Bomber. That's a big, not subtle. Even more interesting: the footage shows the single H-6N escorted by two J-20s — a visual hint at how the PLA imagines this system being protected en route to its launch point.

For context:


  • Shanghai → Los Angeles: ~10,400 km
  • J-20A ferry range: ~4,000–5,000 km
  • JL-1 ALBM range: ~8,000 km with H-6N, the missile itself ~ 3500 km


Anyone can do the math. Anyone tracking Chinese strategic reach already has.

Now, the usual caution: even with official confirmation, we still don't have the full picture. Range figures (which could vary significantly under real operational conditions), payload assumptions (plenty of those floating around from people who write as if they work inside the CMC building in Beijing), and operational doctrine all need more data. I'll leave it to the professionals to sort out what the numbers actually mean once they've finished poking at the footage and the phrasing.

But as far as public signals go? This is a big one.

 



 




Thursday, June 05, 2025

Photos Of The Day: A possible air refuelable PLAAF strike package

YY-20 + J-15 + J-20 + H-6N

 




 

Friday, January 03, 2025

Power Projection PR Of The Day: H-6N "President Xi's soft-power on display," Mid Air Refueling

PLA watchers have had a busy two months, with stealth fighters, new assault ships, and a new Y-20-based KJ3000 AWAC.  However, one aspect is being overlooked: the "fully operational" status of the new H-6N air-launched ballistic missile carrier. With mid air refueling, those punch packing ALBM could reach-out-to-the-second-island-chain and touch someone.

Fear not; judging by several literature on the H-6N, professionals are paying attention to this important advancement. 




 

Sunday, September 13, 2026

Just Photos: The twin 130 mm main gun mount of the Luda-class destroyer DDG 132 Hefei during dismantling.

 




Tuesday, December 15, 2015

PLAN Commission of the day: DDG 174 Hefei

Type-052D destroyers likely to join China’s carrier battle group: expert
Source: China Military OnlineEditor: Yao Jianing
2015-12-15 17:400

BEIJING, Dec. 15 (ChinaMil) -- The guided missile destroyer Hefei (Hull No. 174), the new comer of China’s Type-052D guided missile destroyer family, joined the South China Sea Fleet of the PLA Navy on Dec.12, 2015.

This new warship is the third Type-052D guided missile destroyer independently developed and built by China. Together with the Kunming (Hull No. 172) and the Changsha (Hull No. 173), all the three Type-052D guided missile destroyers of China, which are good at regional air defense and attacking surface targets, belong to the South China Sea Fleet.

Does it mean that such deployment is related to the current South China Sea situation?

According to Du Wenlong, a researcher from PLA’s Academy of Military Sciences (AMS), as China’s most advanced guided missile destroyers, the more complex combat environments will surely facilitate the three Type-052D warships to verify their combat effectiveness so as to allow their problems and shortcomings to be exposed as soon as possible for future improvement.

There also have been media reports predicting that the strong-firepower Type-052D destroyers will play an important role in China’s future aircraft carrier battle groups.

Du made positive comments on the media reports by saying that the aircraft carrier is vulnerable to various kinds of fire attacks and it is a must for warships with powerful anti-submarine, anti-ship and air defense capabilities to act as its escorts.

Multipurpose is the most prominent feature of the Type-052D guided missile destroyer with an integration of capabilities of air defense, anti-ship, anti-missile and anti-submarine. So, the Type-052D destroyers are the most suitable warships to join China’s aircraft carrier battle groups to date, Du concluded.